Monday, January 20, 2020

Dr. Suzanne Humphries MD: Another good doctor who finds serious problems with vaccines

Dr. Humphries is a nephrologist (kidney doctor)

Interview

She points out that Lester, England was highly vaccinated but was still experiencing a high rate of small pox. They stopped vaccinating, despite threats that they would destroy the world, but the rate of small pox decreased. In fact, when small pox was eradicated, a small percentage of the world was vaccinating. However, during that time, sewage systems were being installed all over the world and this is the main reason that small pox was substantially reduced. Less germs were being transmitted. The reason she describes pox as being reduced and not eliminated as the corporate press tends to describe it is because there are other forms of pox, like monkey pox, that are still out there.

She also discussed several other diseases whose incidence started rapidly decreasing before the vaccine for it was introduced. For example, tetanus (Canada). The disease was on a rapid decline for 50 years before the vaccine was introduced. Graphs are similar for the USA and the UK.


She points out that an essential problem with the basic method vaccines is that it introduces a disease in a manner different from how a disease normally enters the body. For example, measles is inhaled but the vaccine is injected directly into the bloodstream so the body's response to the injection is different than it is when it builds a natural resistance. And then of course the vaccine contains all kinds of other chemicals (mercury, aluminum, formaldehyde.

She says also that proper studies are not really being done on vaccines. A true blind study would take half a population of vaccinated and half not. However, the great majority of people have been vaccinated. Most of the time when studies compare vaccinated to not vaccinated the non-vaccinated have been received most vaccinations but might be missing one of them.

"I say nobody has proven to me that they are safe, that I have scientific reason to believe that the components that are in them, and how they act upon the immune system and the potential for autoimmunity and cancers and neurologic diseases is there, and so I cannot say, guarantee that these vaccines are safe, not even one of them, let alone numerous vaccines in the childhood vaccination program given earlier and earlier and more and more."

She also commented on the startling aggressiveness of many people with regard to getting vaccinations. They tend not to want you to hear the other side.

"And what you might notice if you have been in the middle of this problem yourself is that the people who want to vaccinate are often very aggressive, and they don't want you to hear the other side. And that should make a light-bulb in your head go off, why don't they want me to hear the other side, why don't they think I can actually listen to both and come up with my own decision. See I will never tell you not to vaccinate, but they will always tell you to vaccinate for everything. That alone I believe should be a red flag to you. That I'm saying you listen to everything and then you choose. What you do is your responsibility. And that's not what the people who are supporting this aggression vaccination campaign, more and more vaccines all the time for little babies (are doing)." 

Her website.

This is a rational person, an educated person. She is a medical doctor. She is a scientist. The image that anybody who questions vaccines is a nut, is ignorant, is just listening to propaganda is itself propaganda. This woman is incredibly well informed and experienced. She is a doctor. Her arguments are very strong.

No comments:

Post a Comment